Chalices WorshipWeb Chalices

Contents

This document introduces Unitarian Universalist worship theory in the following sections:

Introduction

Purpose and function

Thematic and liturgical worship

Vogt's model

Other models

Worship style

Setting and mood

What we bring

The goal of worship

Back to:
Resource Library
WorshipWeb Home

Common Worship: How and Why
Turn to previous page Turn to previous page

Other models of worship

Other theoretical models. While Vogt seems to provide the basis for much Unitarian Universalist worship, even for those who think in more thematic terms, there are other theoretical models which have their own validity.

Gendlin's theory of psychotherapeutic change. Eugene Gendlin, a University of Chicago psychologist and philosopher, has a theory of psychotherapeutic change which has application to worship. It develops as follows:

Applied to worship, there are similarities to Vogt. The major differences lies in the final act, which is less active and more quietly integrative.

The educational model. The educational model which is the foundation of many Unitarian Universalist religious education curriculum kits, notably About Your Sexuality, takes a very similar course to Gendlin's:

Or, applied to worship: In the latter case, Act 2 is more community-centered while Act 4 is integrative.

Worship as pilgrimage. Several persons have suggested that worship is pilgrimage in which the individual is drawn out of one's own individual concerns into a group exploration. At the end of the journey the individual is alone again, but renewed and inspired by the group process. The acts of a service following this model might look like this:

Again, Act 2 is community-centered and Act 3 is inward. Some variations add an "Emptying" section between Approach and Connection. This is similar to Vogt's "Humility."

Wieman's model of creative energy. The Unitarian theologian and philosopher Henry Nelson Wieman regarded common worship as an opportunity for individuals in a group to find integrating energy to deal with deep questions of life. He outlined five steps in the act of worship:

The main difference between Wieman's model and Vogt's model lies in the position of the act of self-examination. In Vogt and most others it is preparation for exploration. In Wieman it is preparation for dedication.

Variety of valid models. Obviously, in a denomination as diverse as ours, no one model is the "correct" model. Each of these examples involves the individuals as they relate to the religious community, to transcendent values, to their own responsibilities in everyday life. Each includes an intellectual element. Each includes inward, reflective time.

An inspiring religious celebration shows careful attention to the succession of moods, to the types of materials used, to the involvement of the people, and the direction in which the worshiper is expected to move. All this is true whether the main vehicle of expression is the words of the leader, or whether these words are combined with music, responses, or other congregational expressions.

     Turn to next page Turn to next page


WorshipWeb Home · UUA Home · Contact UUA

Unitarian Universalist Association
25 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108 · Telephone (617) 742-2100 · Fax (617) 742-2875
Mailbox Information
Feedback
This page was last updated December 1, 2000.
All material copyright © 2000, Unitarian Universalist Association.
There have been [an error occurred while processing this directive] accesses to this page since August 7, 2000.
Address of this page: http://www.uua.org/worshipweb/commonworship/othermodels.html