REACH ARCHIVES
(1994-CURRENT)
More articles about
Other Topics
|
When Individuals Dominate the Group: Some Strategies
by Judith A. Frediani
It can be a facilitator's nightmare. Whether in an adult RE program, a support group or a working committee, one
individual can dominate the group by commanding an inordinate amount of the precious time available, usually by talking
for excessively long periods of time, talking too frequently, and/or taking off on tangents. Often the other participants
suffer in silence, but suffer they do, as does the effectiveness of the group's work. Facilitators have primary, but not
sole, responsibility for addressing these situations.
If you have ever been a teacher, parent, or other caregiver of children, you may agree that "discipline" is 95% prevention (an unscientific estimate, I admit). Because I believe this principle is equally true with adults, most of the suggestions below are designed to head off problems rather than confront them. However, there are also strategies for
confrontation when it is necessary.
- Group Covenant
It is invaluable for any group, whatever its primary focus, to agree on expectations for behavior in their work together. Whether you call those written expectations covenants, agreements, or guidelines, they include a range of issues such as arriving on time, keeping confidentiality, the right to pass, "no put-downs", etc. Ongoing groups like standing committees
can review and renew their agreements annually, or whenever new members are added.
- Short-form covenanting
A time-efficient way to help a group agree to guidelines is to prepare a draft on newsprint
before the first meeting and ask participants to respond. Invite them to add, delete or modify until everyone understands
and accepts the expectations.
- Long-form covenanting
Have the group generate its guidelines from scratch. Although it takes a little longer, it is more participatory and may foster more of a sense of ownership. One approach is to say something like: "Think of a
time when you were a member of a productive and safe group. What would make this group productive and safe for
you?" List responses and encourage discussion until consensus is reached. Then ask, "What do you think should happen
if our behavior is not in keeping with our agreed-upon guidelines?" Discuss.
- Why bother?
A group covenant provides at least three benefits: Expectations are clarified so that misunderstandings are less likely; the agreement makes it clear that everyone, not just the leader(s), is responsible for the effectiveness and enjoyment
of the group experience; the guidelines provide a valid and specific reference for addressing problematic behavior. Leaders
or participants can speak to a group member privately or within the group about their concern that a behavior is not in
keeping with the agreement.
- Begin on time. End on time.
As a facilitator, take this responsibility very seriously. Promptness sends two important messages:
- "We are a group that means what we say. We said we start at 7, and we start at 7."
- "This is a group that respects my time and my needs. The leaders said we would be
done at 9 and we are done at 9. (And can go home to our families!)"
Treating the group and the guidelines with respect fosters other expressions of respect
within the group.
- Model brevity
Leadership is not license to ramble. Make sure your thoughts are organized and succinctly presented. In check-ins and other sharings, be sure you share for less than the allotted time for each person.
- Talking stick
Many groups use a "talking stick" (or feather, or whatever) which one must be holding in order to speak. This device discourages people from spontaneously (and repeatedly) sharing their
thoughts out of turn. It clearly gives the floor to one person at a time, and encourages shared responsibility for participation, since the speaker, not the leader, must decide who to hand it to next. (If it is placed in the center of the circle after each speaker, participants, not leaders, must
still take responsibility for whose turn it is.)
- Passing a Watch
Check-ins can consume much more time than planned. If the group has agreed to a number of minutes for each person's sharing (such as 2 or 5 minutes), pass a watch with a second
hand around the circle. Each person times the person next to them, and gently signals them when
their time is almost up. As a facilitator, you go first. This device is only appropriate if the group
has agreed to limit their sharing to a certain time period. And, of course, common sense should
prevail if someone is sharing a particularly painful or otherwise sensitive experience. In groups
with a history of saying they want a short check-in and doing a long check-in, this is a
consciousness-raiser that often does not have to be repeated to be effective.
- Timed Agenda
It is almost always helpful to post an agenda at the beginning of any meeting. People like to know what they are doing and where they are going. Next to each item, suggest a time, and do
an agenda check with the group to get their agreement. This is no less important with support
groups than with Board meetings, although the former will likely have a much less detailed
agenda than the latter.
Use the timed agenda to enlist the whole group in taking responsibility for the process. If they fall behind in the timing, say "I'm concerned (or 'I notice') that we are behind our agreed upon schedule. What do you suggest we do about this?" Let the group make suggestions.
Usually, they volunteer that they need to be more focused and self-disciplined, particularly if you ask, "Shall we extend our meeting time by 45 minutes?" Be aware that the group may decide that it really needs to spend the entire time on one activity. if this is the consensus of the group, then it is what they should do, as long as it is an intentional group decision. Responsibility, not inflexibility, is the goal.
- Small groups
People like to talk. One way to give everyone a chance to talk within a limited time frame is to divide participants into groups of two or more to share. When the whole group regathers, the small groups can share according to the time you have allotted-from as little as a word or phrase to a written report. Use the promise of small group time to interrupt lengthy discussions or sharings, suggesting that the small group exercise will be a more appropriate place to share that story, etc.
- Unfinished business list
Post a sheet of newsprint on which to list people's questions and concerns that cannot be addressed in the program without derailing the schedule or focus of the group. As people go off on tangents that are important to them, but not germane to the task at hand, interrupt politely, affirm that their issue deserves attention, explain that we cannot address it now, write it on the newsprint and promise to return to it. Be sure to return to it at the time you have set aside (end of session, end of program, whenever).
- Leveling the playing field
Some people are quick to speak up; others need time for reflection. Some are comfortable competing for the floor; others are not and will not. The result is that a few people consistently speak first, more often and at greater length. But only if the discussion mode is "survival of the
fittest," (that is, most verbally aggressive). Below are some techniques to equalize opportunities to speak.
- Reflection
Before putting a question or topic before the group for discussion, ask them to reflect silently for a minute ( or two). Then ask the question. Do not allow anyone to break this silence except to ask a clarifying question. Then break the silence by calling on
someone who has not spoken at length or by using one of the options below.
- Taking turns
Suggest that the group go around the circle with each person sharing
briefly who wishes to do so. Start with someone who does not dominate.
- Ask that people who have not shared go first.
Remember, this is an invitation; it should not feel coercive or put anyone on the spot.
- Body language
Watch for body language indicating that someone wants to speak, but is hesitant to compete for the floor. Call on her or him in an encouraging way.
- Eye contact
Try not to make eye contact with the person or persons who have been
doing too much talking. It is a green light for them to speak. (It is surprisingly hard to avoid looking at the person you have come to expect
to speak out.)
- Process check
Schedule a 5- to 10-minute group process check at the end of each session or meeting. Ask, "How was our process?" When you introduce this concept, make it clear that a process check is not an evaluation of the leader(s), but an invitation to everyone to reflect on their own participation and their experience of the group process as a whole. A process check encourages
self-awareness, communicates that everyone shares responsibility for the process, and gives people an opportunity to voice their concerns or frustrations.
- When all else fails
Usually participants are reluctant to confront each other and look instead to the facilitator to handle dominating members. If preventative strategies have failed, try these interventions.
- Interrupt
Don't be afraid to interrupt a speaker in front of the group. To let him or her go on and on is to disrespect all the participants. Examples of respectful but firm
interruptions: "Excuse me, Frank, but I'm concerned about the time;"
"I'm going to stop you there, Mary, because I'm concerned that we are moving off our
focus;" "Frank, can you summarize your point in 25 words or less, because we need to move on;" "Mary, is this an issue we can put on the Unfinished Business list? We can't address it right
now." Usually people respond by cooperating, and usually if the facilitator is willing to interrupt garrulous behavior, the garrulous become quieter, the quiet become bolder, and a rough equality evolves. Remember to appeal to the group guidelines and the agenda as objective references for behavioral expectations.
- Speak to the person privately
When a participant is really not responding to
preventative strategies or gentle confrontations in the group, speak with him or her at the break or after the meeting. You can be more candid in private.
Use "I" statements to state the problem: "I am concerned about staying on our schedule." "I
am concerned that not everyone has an opportunity to speak when some people speak at
length. It is my responsibility to bring everyone into the process."
Name the participant's behavior if they don't own it themselves. Be specific: "Frank, are you
aware that you interrupted Mary, John and Louise when they were sharing? We agreed as a
group to listen to each other respectfully." Give him or her an opportunity to voice his or her concerns: "Mary, how is this group working for you? You seemed frustrated tonight. Is there something you need from me or the group?"
- Try to enlist their help in agreeing to a solution
Affirm them and appeal to their sense of fairness. "Frank, I value your participation in this group, and I need to be respectful of
everyone's time and needs. What do you think I should do when someone repeatedly interrupts others?"
Hopefully, the participant will acknowledge his or her behavior and modify it in the future. If the behavior continues unabated, it is likely that the person is not merely needy or thoughtless, but seriously hostile. Confronting him or her may cause them to leave the group. This is their
choice, and if you have treated them respectfully, you should not feel that their decision is your failure.
From REACH September 1995
|