UU World Magazine Article March/April, 2003: Our Calling
Share the Good News
I spent some time recently rereading our Purposes and Principles. You
may well think that I can recite them by heart, but periodically I make
it a point to read them again. It is a good discipline to revisit our
foundational language occasionally. We are having so much success making
our faith more visible in the world that more and more of us are getting
asked the question: "What's a Unitarian Universalist?" When
most of us answer, we tend to go first to the Seven Principles.
What struck me as I reread the Principles was that they contain not
one piece of traditional religious language, not one single word. And
this is a wonderment to me.
Our Principles serve us well as a covenant, presenting a vision of
a more just world on which we agree and our promise to walk together
toward that vision, whatever our theology. But I wonder whether the
language of the Principles is sufficient to capture our individual searches
for truth and meaning. For this, I think we need what the Rev. David
Bumbaugh, a Unitarian Universalist minister and religious humanist,
calls a vocabulary of reverence. "We have manned the ramparts of
reason and are prepared to defend the citadel of the mind," Bumbaugh
writes. "But in the process . . . we have lost . . . the ability
to speak of that which is sacred, holy, of ultimate importance to us,
the language which would allow us to enter into critical dialogue with
the religious community."
Our resistance to religious language, I believe, helps to account for
the struggle that so many of us experience in trying to say who we are
as Unitarian Universalists. I always encourage people to work on their
elevator speech, what you'd say when you're going from the sixth floor
to the lobby and somebody asks you, "What's a Unitarian Universalist?"
You've got forty-five seconds. Here's my latest: "The Unitarian
side tells us that there is only one God, one spirit of life, one power
of love. The Universalist side tells us that God is a loving God, condemning
none of us, valuing the spark of divinity that is in every human being."
So my version of what Unitarian Universalism stands for is, "One
God, no one left behind."
Many of you, I know, are bothered by the use of the word "God."
I understand. I called myself an atheist when I came to Unitarian Universalism
and was a devoted humanist for years, although my spiritual path has
taken me elsewhere. But "religious language" doesn't have
to mean "God talk." David Bumbaugh observes that a vocabulary
of reverence is implicit in humanism, with its emphasis on human study
and understanding of the natural world:
Humanism . . . gave us a doctrine of incarnation which suggests not
that the holy became human in one place at one time to convey a special
message to a single chosen people, but that the universe itself is
continually incarnating itself in microbes and maples, in hummingbirds
and human beings, constantly inviting us to tease out the revelation
contained in stars and atoms and every living thing.
This is truly religious language. As Bumbaugh says, it "whispers
of a larger meaning to our existence," and carries with it implications
for how we should live.
Your elevator speeches may be very different from mine. Hone them.
Put a name to what calls you, and to what you find yourself called to
do in response. Practice telling it to others. We have Good News for
a world that badly needs it. But we may need to expand our vocabularies
if we want others to hear us.
In faith,

William G. Sinkford
President, Unitarian Universalist Association
|