Posted by Scott Akridge on March 26, 2003 at 18:00:03:
In Reply to: War: Unavoidable posted by Steven Beck on March 22, 2003 at 13:11:43:
I'm curious to know from those who share this philosophy (which I do not), which, of the countries that are considered dangerous to the U.S. by our current administration, should we attack next?
Possibly we should use our military might to rid the entire world of anyone who feels threatened by our military might so they can't strike at us first.
Possibly we should begin incarcerating U.S. Citizens who might have the potential to harm or kill someone before they actually do that.
: If war in Iraq in unavoidable, then why are their protest rallies? Can they not see that it is necessary? Saddam has vowed over and over that he will "strike fear into the hearts" of the american people. Protests will happen until something personal happens to them. Take 9/11 for example. There would have been a riot if we went into afganistan and removed him before 9/11. But now that he did, its okay to remove him. So basically, its not okay to remove Saddam until he kills innocent american lives?