|
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
Washington Office for Advocacy
1320 18th Street, Suite 300B Washington, DC 20036
(202) 296-4672 x15 fax (202) 296-4673
Rob Cavenaugh, Director
rcavenaugh@uua.org
http://www.uua.org/uuawo
WE URGE YOU TO OPPOSE PRE-EMPTIVE, UNILATERAL MILITARY ACTION AGAINST
IRAQ BEFORE PEACEFUL, DIPLOMATIC CHANNELS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED; AND AUTHORIZE
FORCE ONLY AS PART OF AN INTERNATIONAL COALITION
October 4, 2002
Dear Senator,
On behalf of the more than 1,050 congregations that make up the Unitarian
Universalist Association, I urge you to oppose any resolution that would
allow for the pre-emptive, unilateral use of military force against Iraq.
The President should provide compelling evidence to Congress that peaceful,
diplomatic methods for reducing Iraq's threat to US security have been
exhausted before the use of force is authorized. Even then, Congress should
only authorize the use of US military forces as part of international
coalition.
First and foremost, if the United States seeks the enforcement of international
law, as expressed in United Nations Security Council Resolutions, than
it must work through the Security Council. To do otherwise would flout
the very international legal principles that the Administration is seeking
to uphold. The Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations has
passed more than 6 major statements since 1961 affirming our support for
the United Nations. We believe that the United Nations was created precisely
for situations like this, so that conflicts between nations could be resolved
diplomatically, not militarily. These channels should be exhausted before
any use of force is authorized.
Second, the human and financial costs associated with the unilateral
use of force are staggering. The human cost, measured in the lives of
both US and Iraqi soldiers and civilians, could easily be many times the
number who died on September 11. Financially, in these times of market
uncertainty and growing budget deficits, it is morally and fiscally irresponsible
to take what could easily be more than 75 billion dollars away from domestic
programs that meet human needs. Just two weeks ago, the New York Times
reported that "according to US Census Data, the number of poor Americans
rose last year to 32.9 million, an increase of 1.3 million, while the
proportion living in poverty rose to 11.7 percent, from 11.3 percent in
2000." Poverty is a weapon of mass destruction, and the United States
should be fighting it here at home.
Third, we fear that unilateral military action may further threaten our
national security by fueling anti-US terrorism and increasing instability
in a region that is already a powder-keg of violence. Past efforts to
unilaterally install democracies have resulted in a backlash of reactionary
regimes such as the Ayatollah in Iran, the Taliban in Afghanistan, and
Pinochet in Chile.
Last, we oppose the doctrine of pre-emption. Not only does it isolate
the US from the international community and international law, but it
also creates an incredibly dangerous precedent for other nations to follow.
While the Cold War-era doctrine of containment may be outdated, we believe
it should be replaced with one that acknowledges the increasing interdependence
among national politics and economics, and commits the United States to
supporting international institutions.
We believe that the stakes are too high, and the proof of imminent threat
to low, to warrant authorizing force without more compelling evidence,
public debate, and serious Congressional deliberation. The principles
of the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations affirm both
the "use of the democratic process" and the "goal of world
community with peace, liberty, and justice for all," and it is in
this spirit that I write to you today. Promoting security and respect
for international law are just and worthy goals, but our means must reflect
our ends.
In Faith,
Robert K. Cavenaugh
Director
Back to Responding to the Threat of War & Additional
Resources
|