3034 New Paradigms in Lifespan Faith Development
Gail Forsyth-Vail, Rev. Elizabeth Strong, Rev. Helen Zidowecki,
and the Youth of the North Andover congregation
Complete Presentation
A panel of religious educators spoke about the UUA’s new
curriculum development project and about the idea of using the Small
Group Ministry with children and youth.
The new curricula
Rev. Elizabeth Strong, the Religious Education Consultant for the
Mass. Bay District of the UUA, spoke about the new RE curricula.
Strong described the “new paradigm” of UU RE like this:
“The paradigm shift is from a focus on the information
we expect from curriculum to personal spiritual engagement with
it. It is a shift from information obtained from curriculum to
forming a personal relationship to it. Thus the change from the
department of Religious Education to the staff group of Lifespan
Faith Development.”
The
Essex Conversations is a book which contains essays by over
30 religious educators. Through their conversation about core UU
beliefs and the components of UU religious education curricula,
this book helped crystallize the paradigm shift.
An advisory committee working with the new UUA Lifespan Faith Development
staff group suggested that curricula be UU, not just about
UUism, and that it be faith-based. The new staff group wrote this
statement of UU philosophy:
1. The purpose of religious education is the transformation of
our selves and our communities through spiritual, ethical, and faith
development. It is a lifelong process of meaning making inherent
in our humanity.
2. Our spirituality calls us to be in relationship with the Transcendent,
to engage our best selves, to appreciate life as a sacred trust,
to connect with ever-deepening, ever-widening circles of relationship,
to witness awe and mystery, and to do justice.
3. Liberating religious education promotes critical consciousness,
and engages us in a process of inquiry, reflection, and action to
transform our communities and ourselves. Religious education helps
us see beyond our own limitations, and in this way, is inherently
anti-oppressive.
4. In the context of Unitarian Universalism, religious education
facilitates activities of meaning making, spiritual growth, religious
identity, and ethical development. It is the responsibility of the
entire covenanted religious community, as learners and teachers,
to create, support, and engage in these activities for individual
and communal transformation.
5. As religious liberals, the Sources of our Living Tradition offer
rich content and context to explore. As we seek to be faith-keepers,
we celebrate the people, ideas, events, and heritages that identify
and define us.
6. We are guided by our Principles in creating relationships of
trust, inclusion, affirmation, and participation in our learning
communities.
The new curricula will include many new ideas, including these:
worship modules; multiple learning formats; small group ministry;
social justice opportunities; cookbooks of suggestions for how to
adapt curricula; encouragement to add your congregation’s
specific traditions; music, art, drama, and dance resources; audiovisual
and computer study guides; graded lessons; and resource guides around
themes. The new curricula will consider many types of diversity,
and will try to provide many types of guides to go with new curricula.
Presenters stated that “We must involve parents and the whole
congregation in the RE enterprise.”
“We are going from bible-centered to child-centered to UU-principles-centered
to faith-centered,” said Strong. “This programming incorporates
what came before to provide new opportunities for putting together
life experiences to understand our faith development and our religious
tradition.”
Small Group Ministry for children and youth
Gail Forsyth-Vail, Director of Religious Education or North Parish
Unitarian Universalist in North Andover, Massachusetts, described
how her congregation uses Small Group Ministry (SGM) effectively
with children and youth, replacing traditional RE curricula. They
knew they had a problem, said Forsyth-Vail, because of the difficulty
of recruiting teachers; people didn’t want to volunteer because
they themselves had only a cursory knowledge of what they were teaching.
The RE Committee looked at their goals for RE, and found that they
were looking for a sense of connection, development of faith when
life is tough, and a toolkit of skills. They wanted to raise UUs,
not just ethical people.
At the same time, the adult RE group was looking at SGM, so the
RE Committee decided to try the same thing. What if we put the curricula
back on the shelves? What if we don’t know on Thursday what
we’ll be doing on Sunday? The congregation was ready to go
with the new plan.
Every Sunday starts with a worship service for children and youth,
followed by SGM with the children divided into age groups (grades
1-2, 3-5, and 6-8). The adults facilitate rather than teach. Each
SGM starts with check-in, so everyone speaks. Then they reflect
on the worship service, in verbal and other ways. The younger groups
may play and talk, play games, create role-plays, or process the
ideas in other ways. The SGM segment always includes a “carrying
our faith into the world” component – an ongoing social
justice project or a simple goal (be nice to your brother, or getting
enough sleep). RE ends with appreciation, wishes, and closure.
The North Andover church does intergenerational services once a
month for about 30 minutes, after which the children leave for SGM
sessions.
The results have been excellent. The adults are more relaxed about
connecting. The program turns on a dime when world events intervene.
Children and adults share together; what a gift to hear an adult
talk about attending their first funeral, or an adopted child talk
about her experiences with adoption. Adults are the primary pastoral
care givers to these children and youth. Adult can let the minister
or DRE know when a child needs pastoral care.
New UUs tend to stay with their kids for many weeks. Forsyth-Gail
found that they stayed through the worship service to find out what
we were telling their children, then left at the beginning of the
SGM part to rejoin the adults.
What about parents who want their kids to learn specific facts
and stories about Bible stories and world religions, asked the Rev.
Geoffrey Rimositis. Forsyth-Gail responded that this new method
trades breadth for depth. Each story is chosen very carefully. Public
schools teach more about cultural diversity and evolution so we
don’t need to cover that; instead, we need to give our children
and youth the experience of examining their own reactions to religious
stories and question.
Forsyth-Gail has written a practical guide called Adapting
Small Group Ministry for Children’s Religious Education
(contact her for availability).
Rev. Helen Zidowecki, Religious Education Consultant for the Northeast
District, Unitarian Universalist Association, and Acting Director
of Religious Education for Church of the Larger Fellowship starting
August 2003, also encouraged congregations to consider using SGM
in RE. Why should SGM be only for adults, she asked, when its characteristics
are so relational?
Zidowecki spoke about how SGM has changed her approach to RE. Typically,
the questions used in SGM discussion focus on how participants relate
to stories rather than on learning the specifics. The learning is
from the impact of the story and the dialog rather than specific
content. UUism doesn’t have a set body of knowledge, Zidowecki
said, so we have some latitude in content. We can focus on spiritual
development for a lifetime.
UU RE has moved from an instructional model to a community connection
and relational model, which Zidowecki calls “relational RE.”
She replaces lessons with session plans, classes with groups, and
teachers with leaders. Each leader is a participant, too, and shares
in the dialog. Preparation focuses on thinking about the leader’s
own reaction to the topic. Curriculum writing focuses on the experience
of the individual rather than on the group. A SGM model gives greater
latitude in how to group participants, not just by age. Groups that
cover several years allow participants to learn from each other.
Arts and crafts enhance the dialog, rather illustrating the learning
-- it’s a reflection of one’s own reaction to the story.
Myths and wisdom stories are a major resource.
In small congregations such as those in the Northeast district,
said Zidowecki, mentoring is about interactions on a personal level.
UUs already use mentoring for Coming of Age programs, but we can
use it for the very young all the way up. Mentoring is about sharing
in small groups if not one-to-one, and SGM can provide a way for
an adult to mentor a group of children.
For more information, find out about SGM at Zidowecki’s
web site or read her paper “Relational Religious Education:
the Small Group Ministry Model.”
Programming that empowers youth to carry faith into
the world
Several youth from the North Parish Unitarian Universalist of North
Andover MA spoke about their experience with SGM. Elise Forcino
reported that SGM was about meeting interesting people and having
meaningful discussions with no “homework.” She asked
her congregation why youth who had come through the Coming of Age
program and joined the church couldn’t join a SGM group, and
became a member of the first intergenerational SGM group.
Heather Vail liked the way that older youth work with younger youth,
helping in the Junior Youth classes and modeling an interest in
a commitment to UU spirituality. Membership in the Youth Adult Committee
teaches youth how to get things done in committees and how to influence
what happens in the church. YAC members are far more likely to attend
Sunday morning church.
Christine Middleton reported that when the U.S. went to war with
Iraq, the congregation held a peace vigil that inspired her to organize
a vigil each week for junior youth to adults. It was less about
changing the world and more about coming together to share hopes
and fears about this time.
Daniel Brosnan attended a three-day youth leadership institute
that created a service project to benefit the local community. They
chose a project with meaning to them: teen pregnancy and domestic
violence.
Reported for the Web by Margy Levine Young, edited by Lisa
Presley; Web Design by Paul Hughes
|