3022 If Not God, What? A Humanist Elevator Speech
Rev. Kathleen Korb
One of the most interesting things to me about this task is my
discovery
that I am not at all sure that I can define humanism either in the
length
of time that it would take an elevator to traverse four floors or
in the
ten minutes that I have been given today. This is true even though
when I
took the beliefnet test it came out 100% secular humanist. (I don't
care
for that term anyway, thinking that it scarcely behooves us to allow
Jerry
Falwell's popularization of the term to name us, and besides if
I am
anything it is a religious humanist, but that's another issue.)
I am not
entirely alone in this problem. Some years ago there was an article
in the
UU World purporting to describe the sense of marginalization of
the
humanists at the Ministers' Association meeting in Hot Springs,
AR. The
article got all the feelings right and all the facts, except for
the date
and place of the meeting, wrong, but what was particularly interesting
to
me was that it used the word humanist to mean three entirely different
things. The definitions were only discoverable from the context,
since the
author never defined the term at all, but the three meanings were
materialist atheist, humanitarian, and anyone who uses reason and
critical
thinking in theological discourse.
The humanists did feel marginalized at that meeting as did several
other
groups including the rational Christians, but it shouldn't necessarily
have
surprised us. The position of humanism, despite its continued widespread
use as self-identification among Unitarian Universalists has been
declining
steadily ever since the 1960s. It has even, in some circles, become
a term
of opprobrium. I remember a ministers meeting I attended in the
Southwest
District a while ago when one of my friends used the word rationalist
humanist in the same tone as she might have used the word pedophile.
When I
pounded my fist, having finally lost it, and said, "Dammit,
I'm a
rationalist humanist!" she said, "Oh, but you're not like
the ones I mean."
"Oh, yes I am!" I said.
However, there has been a strain among us that I would call fundamentalist
- and ours is the only religion in the world that could produce
this kind
of fundamentalism - that has known the only right way to believe,
and have
constituted themselves as monitors to make sure that religious words
or
rituals should never be used in our congregations. It is my conviction
that
this is a primary cause, though not the only one, of the decline
of
humanism in Unitarian Universalism. It is certainly not that we
are less
humanist. Humanism is in the very bones of our faith, from its beginning
as
rational Christianity which argued that human beings were the only
possible
interpreters of the teachings of the Christian church and were perfectly
capable of discerning truth for themselves, down to the present
day.
Humanism is not really a theological position. Erasmus, the great
humanist
of the Renaissance, was certainly a Christian, for example, and
there can
be theist humanists, nontheist humanists and atheist humanists.
In present
day usage, however, it does imply a rejection of the supernatural
and the
idea of an intervening god, the acceptance of the scientific world-view,
critical thinking, and the ability of human beings freely to choose
the
good and be, therefore, accountable for their choices.
It is sometimes argued that we only know what we don't believe
rather than
what we do. We reject the traditional beliefs of religion, but what
do we
put in its place? In fact, I'm not sure that's such a terrible thing,
though I've had parishioners say that about themselves in some distress.
However, when the society as a whole at least says that it believes
certain
things, that is the context within which we are required to define
ourselves. It is very easy to hear a statement of faith and know
immediately that you don't believe it. For example, the idea of
a personal
god who created the world and cares for every person in it, who
can be
petitioned and who will take care of things is easy to reject. As
my mother
used to say, "If God sees every sparrow fall, why doesn't he
pick some of
them up?" The evidence just isn't there for that kind of god.
Deciding what
you do believe, though, is a life-long process, and being willing
to
challenge the unbelievable is an important part of it, when the
unbelievable is generally accepted.
The humanist source in the bylaws of our association says that
we warn
against idolatries of the mind and spirit. One of my antihumanist
friends
asked me skeptically if I thought that that was true, and I said
that
indeed, it is one of our first tasks. To believe in and worship
idols, to
turn the unknown into the supernatural, to believe not on evidence
but from
desire, is one of the deepest frailties of the human spirit. It
takes great
courage to face a universe that is indifferent to you, and yet that
is what
the humanist does. We will not worship idols, we will not believe
that for
which there is no evidence, we will and do face the world supported
only by
our faith in the possibilities of humankind, its ability to build
and to
create, and freely to choose what is good and beautiful.
We cannot and do not wish to deny that human beings can also do
evil, from
fear, from lack of knowledge, from self-absorption and greed or
from a will
to power, or even from a lack in their humanity, a failure of conscience.
We are almost infinitely small in relation to the universe, too
prone to
error, unable to live up even to our own understanding of what is
good and
right. Nevertheless, we have created amazing structures of thought,
marvellous works of engineering, symphonies and sculpture, poetry
and
prose. We are, so far as we know, the only sentient being on this
earth
struggling to understand what our purpose is, why we live and why
we die,
or how, in living, we can make our lives worthwhile. The humanist
response
is to look to humanity to discover greatness.
So what will I say when I enter the elevator on the first floor
and someone says to me, "Just what is a humanist, anyway?"
Well, at this time and place, here is my answer. A humanist accepts
the scientific world-view, its explanations of the origins of the
universe and the evolution of humankind as a natural part of that
universe. We believe those things for which we have found evidence,
reflected upon and refined by the use of reason and critical thought.
That which we revere and find sacred is manifest in human freedom
to choose the good, its quest for truth, its love of justice, its
practice of compassion, and its creation and appreciation of beauty.
We believe that it is through human will and human work that the
ills in our lives can be overcome and the world can become a place
of beauty, of peace, of justice and of love.
Web Design by Julie Albanese
|