3022 If Not God, What? A Humanist Elevator Speech
Rev. Brian Eslinger
Rev. Kathleen D. Korb: Complete
Remarks
Dr. David E. Schafer: Complete
Remarks
Rev. Sarah Oelberg
If you were a humanist and someone who was riding in an elevator
with you asked you to define your beliefs, what would you say, given
the brief ride?
 |
|
| Audience |
|
In this workshop, sponsored by HUUmanists
,
a panel of four Humanist U.U.s took the challenge and, in doing
so, demonstrated that among Humanists in the denomination there
is a diversity of belief. Each panelist summarized his or her spiritual
journey, culminating in an “elevator speech.”
Rev. Brian Eslinger of the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of
Ames in Ames, Iowa, described an incident in his youth on his family’s
farm in which, after having just filled the tractor with gas, he
rode away, inadvertently catching the hose from the tank and releasing
a torrent of fuel, which he tried to collect into a series of nearby
pails.
| |
 |
| |
Rev.
Brian Eslinger |
“I wasn’t sure how (my father) would react to this
(incident). Times were very tight then…and that was a hell
of a lot of gas we just lost. …He gave me this look that was
just so filled with compassion….” Eslinger used this
incident as a metaphor to describe what happened when he left the
Methodist faith of his childhood. He felt an emptiness, much like
the depleted gas tank, but yet there remained values from that tradition
and others (Zen Buddhism, Native American spirituality, paganism)---values
such as radical economic ethics and inclusivity, compassion, interconnectedness
and reverence for the earth---which he retained in “buckets”
of belief. Later, when he discovered Unitarian Universalism, he
realized that “what I saved in all those buckets was Religious
Humanism.”
Eslinger ended with his “elevator speech”: “Religious
Humanism is one that celebrates the beauty of life as it is experienced
in our own lives, as it is expressed in the arts and in the natural
world and in experiences of love itself. Religious Humanism also
challenges us to respond to that beauty by bringing the best of
ourselves forward, to help make that same experience possible for
all people, to help us to create a world where justice is possible,
where peace is permissible, and where compassion is a standard to
which all our actions are held. All of life is our text. All of
human experience is our revelation.”
 |
|
| Panel |
|
Rev. Kathleen D. Korb, of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation
of Greater Naples in Naples, Fla., took a different approach, claiming
from the outset that she wasn’t sure she could define Humanism
in any terms. She pointed out, however, that when she took the Beliefnet
test
, she scored 100% as a Secular Humanist and 100% as a U.U. She said
that such a difficulty with defining Humanism is shared by other
U.U.s She cited a U.U. Ministers Association meeting several years
ago at which, she claimed, the denomination’s humanists in
attendance, along with the Rational Christians, felt marginalized.
“(This marginalization) shouldn’t necessarily have surprised
us,” she said. “The position of Humanism, despite its
continued we as a self-identification among Unitarian Universalists
has been declining steadily ever since the 1960s. It has even in
some circles become a term or opprobrium.”
She explained, however, that there is a fundamentalist strain of
Humanism which has sought “to make sure that religious words
or rituals should never be used in our congregations.” She
believes that this is a major contributing factor to the decline
of Humanism in Unitarian Universalism.
“Humanism is in the very bones of our faith,” she said,
“from its beginning in Rational Christianity, which argued
that human beings were the only possible interpreters of the teachings
of the Christian church and were perfectly capable of discerning
truth for themselves.” Korb said that Humanism is not a theological
position. There can be all kinds of Humanists: Christian, Rational,
secular, theistic, atheistic, etc.
She cited these implied Humanist characteristics: a rejection of
the supernatural and of an intervening God, acceptance of the scientific
world view, critical thinking, and humans’ ability to freely
choose the good and be accountable for their choices. Rather than
knowing how to define themselves by what they believe, many Humanists
use contrast as their tool. “…When society as a whole
at least says that it believes certain things, that is the context
within which we are required to define ourselves,” said Korb.
“It’s very easy to hear a statement of faith and know
immediately that you don’t believe it.”
Korb’s “elevator speech” “A Humanist accepts
the scientific world view, its explanation of the origins of the
universe and the evolution of humankind as a natural part of that
universe. We believe those things for which we have found evidence,
reflected upon and refined by the use of reason and critical thought.
That which we revere and find sacred is manifest in human freedom
to choose the good, its quest for truth, its love and justice, its
practice of compassion, and its creation and appreciation of beauty.
We believe that it is through human will and human work that the
ills in our lives can be overcome and the world can become a place
of beauty, of peace, of justice and of love.”
Dr. David E. Schafer, a physiologist, and a member of the Unitarian
Society of New Haven in Hamden, Conn., studied Christianity, Judaism,
and other religions often in their original languages, and had a
very intellectual approach to religion. He finally came to Humanism
through his studies in the philosophy of science and in science
itself. “It’s often said that Humanists fail to emphasize
sufficiently the awe and the wonder of the universe,” he said,
“but I must say that I have found that scientists are motivated
by their awe and wonder of the subjects that they work on. And I
find the molecular and cellular structures of our bodies to be perfectly
amazing and beautiful. I think there’s enough awe and wonder
in our world to satisfy anyone’s craving for these things.”
He has found that, when the answer to a mystery has been discovered,
there are two kinds of people: those who see that discovery as a
loss and grieve it, and those who are uplifted by the discovery,
knowing that there are still many more mysteries to solve. As a
Humanist, he, too, rejects the concept of the supernatural.
Schafer is a musician and composer. He discovered Unitarian Universalism
when he was asked by a member of the music committee of a U.U. church
to be its chairman. Not a U.U. at the time, Schafer was surprised
and intrigued by the fact that it didn’t seem to matter to
the music committee.
Commenting on the title of this presentation, “If Not God,
What?”, Schafer said that it needed a verb, but that he couldn’t
think of an appropriate one to describe a substitute view of God.
“For me as a Humanist, I don’t have a substitute for
God. I have humanist values, but I don’t worship humans.”
He doesn’t believe in a personal God that rewards and punishes
us. Schafer’s substitute for the entire title, however, is
“What Do We Value, As Humanists?” “The problem
with (the ‘elevator speech’),” he said, “is
that as you shorten (it) down to a reasonable length, it doesn’t
mean anything. You have to define every word in order to make sense
out of it.”
Schafer said that to formulate his “elevator speech,”
he preferred to borrow from the words of John Dietrich, a signer
of the Humanist
Manifesto :
“Science and democracy are the essence of Humanism.”
Schafer added a modification to this definition. He said humans
are lucky to have rational minds but we don’t often use them,
and we need a system of life and thought that takes into account
the emotions. He believe that music, poetry and other arts---in
fact all forms of beauty, natural or human-made---are important
in addressing the emotions. “Three things are essential (to
a Humanist view of life): life, love and truth.”
Schafer then gave his “elevator speech”: “We
hold conscious life precious, and we cherish the inherent worth
and dignity of every member of our human family. Our beliefs are
driven by a free and responsible search for truth, through careful
observation and analysis, which constantly increases our understanding
of ourselves and the rest of nature, of which we are an integral
part. Because the universe is hostile to life, and earth is a tiny
oasis supporting life, we struggle to preserve our fragile environment
here. And so that every member of our human family may achieve the
greatest possible fulfillment, we strive to create for all humanity
the conditions of joyful life, beauty, love health education justice
freedom and peace.”
 |
| Rev.
Sarah Oelberg |
The final speaker, Rev. Sarah Oelberg, of the Nora Unitarian Universalist
Church in Hanska, Minn., defined herself as a lifelong Religious
Humanist. Her first experience with Humanism came when she was 5
years old at a U.U. church in Oklahoma City, Okla. Her Sunday school
class was singing the children hymn “Jesus Loves Me, This
I Know,” when the minister abruptly interrupted the class,
which caused the teacher to run out of the room in tears, to tell
the children that they couldn’t sing such a song. He said,
“Jesus can’t love you. He’s dead.” He pointed
out that only people who are alive can love. He went on to explain
that the Bible is a collection of stories and that Jesus was a good
man and teacher, but that the children should never feel that they
need someone else in order to live a good life. They can decide
things on their own. She described the many Humanist principles
that the minister taught her.
“Religion to me is that which people have invented to help
them explain the big, unanswerable questions of life,” she
said. “Religion does not need to be theistically based in
order to support how we live in the world.”
Her elevator speech: “Humanism is my religion. It is a faith
focused on hope, love and charity, directed at humanity, realizing
that ultimately it is human beings who can and do make a difference,
giving respect, dignity, justice, peace and good will to the human
community. It is committed to discovering objective truth through
the use of reason, science and direct experience, while recognizing
that there are other ways of knowing. These tools tell me that we
are an integral part of the interdependent web of nature, the diverse
peoples of the world and the commonweal. Therefore we have a responsibility
to be actively engaged in the world, to care for our environment
and care about other people of all kinds and in all situations.
It gives me my ethical grounding. It is a religion of responsibility,
but also of joy, as it celebrates the arts, music and crafts, which
result from human creativity. Humanism is what gives my life meaning.”
Reported for the web by Jeanette Leardi; Web Design by Julie
Albanese
|