Honorable Mention Winner (one of two) 2003 Richard
Borden Sermon Award
"Nothing is Black and White"
The Rev. Katie Lee Crane
First Parish of Sudbury, Massachusetts
I was going to talk about racial issues today.
I was, that is, until someone reminded me that today is the 21st
anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
I was going to talk about how race is a social construction.
I was, that is, until I thought of today's anniversary in the context
of the recent shootings at two local women's health centers.
I was going to make the point that skin color is never truly black
or truly white and neither are the issues or the choices.
I was, that is, until I met a woman who works where the
shootings took place and I stared at the horror of that event through
the eyes of one who might have been harmed or even killed.
I was reluctant to change my topic.
I was afraid. Afraid, because it could have been me. It could have
been me aborted. It could have been me having to choose what to
do about an unplanned and untimely pregnancy. It could have been
me, unable to have a child of my own, aching to love the child another
woman aborted. It could have been me shot down as an escort or a
receptionist at a so-called abortion clinic. And, as much as I don't
want to think about it, it could have been me who pulled the trigger.
I was afraid because I know the people in this story. They are
my mother, my sisters, my roommates and friends. They are you and
your lover, your grandmothers, daughters and aunts. They are our
neighbors, our classmates, our colleagues. I was afraid because
I knew there would be people here today who have used the services
of one of these clinics. I knew there would be people here who find
abortion an unacceptable choice under any circumstances and
others who argue vehemently for the right to make that choice.
I was afraid, but I had to speak out.
Still, I didn't know what to say. Is this a sermon about abortion?
About violence? About women's issues? About oppression? About freedom
of speech?
No. It's about how nothing is black and white - about how every
significant issue, every agonizing choice is complex. There's never
an all or nothing, on/off, yes/no answer. Sometimes, in fact, there's
no answer at all. In this morning's reading, Verlyn Klinkenborg
suggests using the clinic parking lot as metaphor. (Verlyn Klinkenborg,
"Violent Certainties," Harpers, January 1995.) "My job,"
he says, "is to make it possible for you to enter the parking lot,
not to tell you what to do when you get there."
So what is the parking lot? Is it the arena where issues are debated,
where tough choices are discussed? Is it the forum where people
who hold different points of view can voice opinions and demonstrate
peacefully? Where discussion and debate can be civil and nonviolent?
That's what I think it should be, given the perspective
from my side of the fence.
But for those on the other side of the fence, the parking lot has
become a battleground where they feel compelled to harass, intimidate
and, occasionally, use physical violence. Like me, they feel they
have to speak out.
How do these people - the extreme fringe of the anti-abortion movement
- differ from occasional anti-abortion protesters? Or, from people
who oppose abortion but do not protest? Or, for that matter, from
the patients and the providers themselves?
What makes them different from you and me?
Klinkenborg remembers what he calls the "same grim purpose in the
faces of anti-war protesters," some of whom might have thrown themselves
in front of cars, climbed onto cars, shackled themselves beneath
cars and super-glued their hands together - all popular tactics
among today's anti-abortion demonstrators. Instead, the 1970 anti-war
protesters of his Berkeley days found it more persuasive to throw
rocks at cops and overturn cars owned by the Atomic Energy Commission
and the US Air Force.
Just different tactics, though. Same grim purpose.
What he concludes is that the extremists have "a ferocious, alienating
certainty." There is a look, he says, that the human face assumes
when the mind stops considering variables - a look of zealotry.
Then, the only questions to be answered are tactical ones.
Some see this zealotry as seductive. It creates a sense of community,
a common bond, a sense of being a persecuted minority. Even one
clinic employee admitted it would be easier to have your questions
answered for you, to have everything explained, and to have a source
of authority that would settle everything.
But nothing is black and white.
It's easy to feel compassion for the families of James Barrett
and John Britton, the escort and physician ambushed in the parking
lot and killed in Pensacola, Florida in 1994. Barrett was a member
of the Pensacola UU church. He was one of dozens of UUs who serve
as clinic escorts around the country.
Tears come freely when I think of Leanne Nichols and Shannon Lawney,
and of Antonio Hernandez or Jane Sauer - all victims of the recent
shootings. Leanne was about to be married. Jane grew up in the Bedford
(MA) UU church. Shannon's funeral filled the Arlington Street Church,
where the UU minister, the Rev. Kim Crawford Harvie, likened their
deaths to the 1963 deaths of the four Black girls murdered as they
attended Sunday school in Birmingham, Alabama.
Yes, it's easy to feel grief for the victims of these crimes. It's
quite another matter to feel anything but rage and outrage at Paul
Hill and John Salvi, the men accused of murdering them.
Yet our Unitarian Universalist principles state that "we affirm
and promote the inherent worth and dignity of every person." They
do not read: we affirm and promote the inherent worth and dignity
of every person except Paul Hill or John Salvi.
Nothing is black and white. Not the color of our skin. Not the
issues. Not the choices. Not the reasons.
The Boston Globe paints 22-year-old Salvi as a troubled
and lonely man with erratic and unpredictable behavior. They suggest
he had an overbearing mother and an indifferent father - a big,
burly, tough guy of a father who disapproved of his son's decision
to become a hairdresser because "it's a woman's kind of thing."
They report that the three had a "tumultuous and bitter relationship."
Another report characterizes these same parents as a faithful Catholic
family, not particularly active on the issue of abortion. His mother
was a church choir director; "John Boy," as they called Salvi in
his youth, was an altar boy until he was 13. Maybe not a perfect
mother and father, but the best they knew how to be - now totally
baffled by their son's actions.
Nothing is black and white.
The Governor is quoted as saying: "[Salvi] is nothing other than
a terrorist.." An Episcopal priest accuses the religious right of
creating a climate that makes shootings like these inevitable because
of "their violent rhetoric and [habit of] demonizing the opposition."
Both make valid and important points. But we who are outraged must
be cautious that we do not respond with violent rhetoric of our
own. We must not demonize the opposition. However heinous his crime,
however disturbed and dangerous he is, Salvi is also a man, a human
being, a son, a classmate, a neighbor..
We affirm and promote the inherent worth and dignity of every
person.
Klinkenborg is right. Abortion is the pretext. We could just as
easily be talking today about the death penalty. Or about gay rights.
Or racial justice. Nuclear power plans. School prayer. Domestic
violence.
Nothing is black and white.
This is really about how we voice our opinions in the parking lot
- and how we keep that parking lot open for everybody who
chooses to express an opinion civilly and nonviolently. It's about
how we live our convictions. How we remember that no one has the
answer; how we challenge ourselves to listen to other points of
view; and how we never, never forget to consider the variables.
Nothing is black and white.
What, then, do we do? You and me. This congregation? How
do we respond? In one article, the author suggested that the worst
enemy is not the extremists but the unknowing complacency of the
American public. One woman is quoted as saying: "Americans don't
want to think about [abortion."] And to fight for its existence
means to have to think about it, to get involved with it, to know
it exists and how it operates. The majority of people, she says,
"just want to know it's there if they need it."
Thinking about that quote, I can substitute a lot of different
words for abortion. Most Americans don't want to think about
racism. Or about ageism, or sexism, or heterosexism, or about the
way these "isms" play out in the parking lot everyday.
I know what she's saying. My response to changing my sermon topic
reflects some of the "unknowing complacency" she was criticizing.
I had other things on my mind. It felt too overwhelming. It seemed
like nothing I could do would make a difference.
I felt paralyzed - stuck -trying to find a middle ground between
complacency and zealotry. I felt caught between my fear of having
no answers and the seduction of that "ferocious certainty" where
no answers are necessary.
That's why I like the parking lot metaphor. My job - at least one
of my jobs - is to make it possible for people who want to debate
issues civilly and nonviolently to have access to the parking lot,
not to tell them what to do when they get there.
That's something I do feel passionate about, something I
will act to defend. I want to stop the violence. I want to
stop the intimidation and harassment. I don't want to stop
the discussion and debate. I want to challenge my complacency and
I want to be vigilant about not demonizing those who hold opinions
dramatically different from my own.
When I feel paralyzed, when I feel that my small effort is hopeless
in the face of so much need, I am reminded of the words of Dorothy
Day that opened today's service: "no one has a right to sit down
and feel hopeless; there is too much work to do." She says simply:
"We must take one step at a time."
When I feel stuck, I am encouraged the Marge Piercy poem, "The
Low Road," that we read together. Alone, there's not a lot I can
do. But two people or three, or a dozen can make a difference. "It
goes on one at a time," she reminds us, "it starts when you care
to act.when you say we and each day you mean one more."
Speaking out against the Vietnam war in 1967, Martin Luther King,
Jr. said: "A time comes when silence is betrayal." It was these
words that finally moved him to, in his words, "break the betrayal
of my own silences and speak from the burnings of my own heart."
I plead with you today to break your own silences and speak from
the burnings of your hearts. I urge you to fight for open access
to that parking lot, asking you to do whatever you can to preserve
an open forum for discussing the issues. It doesn't matter which
issues. They're all important. Act on the issues that mean something
to you. Do what you can do. Write letters. Lick stamps. Join
groups. Volunteer for projects. Create support groups. Raise money.
Educate others. Demonstrate peacefully. And, if you pray, pray fervently.
It all makes a difference.
It starts when you care to act - one at a time - when you do
it again after they say no, when you say We and each day you mean
one more.
Just remember this when you act: Nothing is black and white.
Borden Award
|